Immigration enforcement changes across Americas affect asylum seekers
Immigration policy shifts in multiple countries are creating new challenges for asylum seekers and refugees seeking protection.

Immigration enforcement policies are undergoing significant changes across multiple countries in the Americas, affecting asylum seekers and refugees in different ways.
In San Francisco, the main immigration court has temporarily closed following changes to judicial staffing, creating uncertainty for pending asylum cases in a region that has historically processed a high volume of such applications. The closure has disrupted court schedules and left cases in administrative limbo.
Meanwhile, Canada has implemented stricter asylum rules that are affecting refugees attempting to cross the northern U.S. border. Under the new policies, some asylum seekers who are rejected at Canadian border crossings are being transferred to U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody rather than being allowed to remain in Canada during appeals processes.
One case involves Markens Appolon, a 25-year-old Haitian who fled gang violence that interrupted his economics studies and sought to join family in Montreal. After his asylum claim was rejected at the Canadian border, he was turned over to ICE and has remained in U.S. detention.
In South America, Chile is implementing its own border security measures under President José Antonio Kast's administration. The country has begun constructing trenches along its northern desert border as part of what officials describe as enhanced migration controls, though critics question the effectiveness of such physical barriers.
These simultaneous policy changes reflect broader shifts in immigration enforcement across the region, with governments implementing various measures they say are designed to manage migration flows more effectively.